Metrics: journal’s impact factor skewed by a single paper

Date published: (08 July 2010)
DOI: doi:10.1038/466179b
Published online
07 July 2010

We have discovered a striking example of how the use of impact factors to judge journal performance can bias the whole evaluation system (Nature 465, 845, 864–866, 870–872; 2010).

A surprise in the ‘all journals’ category of Thomson Reuters’ impact factors for 2009 is the meteoric rise to second position of the journal Acta Crystallographica A. That journal’s impact factor, which has not exceeded 2.38 in the past four years, has hit a whopping 49.93. Such startling fluctuations are rare — compare, for example, the impact factors of Nature and the New England Journal of Medicine over the same period at 26.68–34.48 and 44.01–52.58, respectively.

Acta Crystallographica A had 5,966 citations in 2009 for 72 articles published in 2008, of which all — except one — received no more than three citations (data from ISI Web of Knowledge v. 4.98). However, a paper by G. M. Sheldrick entitled ‘A short history of SHELX‘ (Acta Crystallogr. A 64, 112–122; 2008) clocked 5,624 citations. It seems that this article could be responsible for the sudden dramatic inflation of the journal’s impact factor.


2 thoughts on “Metrics: journal’s impact factor skewed by a single paper

  1. Eu acho que o ‘impact factor’ é outra coisa do passado que mais cedo ou mais tarde irá/terá de desaparecer.

    A meu ver não faz qualquer sentido.

  2. Um artigo sobre a circunferência média de mamilos femininos, com ilustrações, é ouro para citações! Muito útil para estudos sobre cancro da mama e bater umas canholas! XD

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s